Qalqalah
If we look at the word Al-Haqq, we will find that it has two qaafs. Al-Haq - a first qaaf that is saakinah and mudghama (is in the position of idghaam), and the second qaaf which was mutaharika and when we stopped at it, it became saakinah because of stopping on it and we applied qalqalah on it.
Those two qaafs, which one of them did we apply qalqalah on? Was it the first one or the second one or both of them? There is no doubt that the first one was not tuqalqal (with qalqalah) - if it was, we would have said "al-haqeqe" and no one does this. So the first qaaf was mudghama in the second qaaf, and the second qaaf is the one with qalqalah, like this: "al haqqe" "al-haq" until now there is no qalqalah "qe" (here is the qalqalah).
What is the difference between al haqq and al falaq? It is the same sound. What does it have to do with the letter that is mudgham?
So why do we say that the letter that is mushaddad (has shaddah) is stronger in qalqalah than the other? I do not find an evidence for this either logically nor in the words of our scholars. Our Imaam Al-Jazariyy (rahimahu-llah) said: and show it muqalqal if it is saakin and if it is in the position of stopping, it is clearer (from al-jazariyyah). This is it - only. The only thing that our scholars, and from the top of them is our Imaam, al-Jazariyy, said that the letter of qalqalah, if it comes in the middle of the word or in the middle of the speech it is muqalqal, but if we stop at it, the qalqalah is clearer, because when we stop at the letter it comes out with ease as there will be no letter after it. For example when I say "lam yalid wa lam yoolad", listen to the daal in yalid and yoolad... I didn't stop at "yalid" so I did qalqalah on it then directly put my mouth in the makhraj of the next letter, but if I had stopped at it..."lam yalide" the the daal will have nothing coming after it so the daal comes out comfortably. It is a very small difference between alqalqalah al-sughra (the smaller qalqalah) and al-qalqalah al-kubra (the greater qalqalah), and the only difference is in stopping. But as for the mushaddad letter and the one that is not mushaddad, then they are the same.
Some of our contemporary brothers who wrote books on tajweed differentiated between the mushaddad letter and the non-mushaddad letter, but this is only words from themselves which they don't have any evidence for, either logical or from the words of scholars. So I just wanted to point out this issue.
Watch
Those two qaafs, which one of them did we apply qalqalah on? Was it the first one or the second one or both of them? There is no doubt that the first one was not tuqalqal (with qalqalah) - if it was, we would have said "al-haqeqe" and no one does this. So the first qaaf was mudghama in the second qaaf, and the second qaaf is the one with qalqalah, like this: "al haqqe" "al-haq" until now there is no qalqalah "qe" (here is the qalqalah).
What is the difference between al haqq and al falaq? It is the same sound. What does it have to do with the letter that is mudgham?
So why do we say that the letter that is mushaddad (has shaddah) is stronger in qalqalah than the other? I do not find an evidence for this either logically nor in the words of our scholars. Our Imaam Al-Jazariyy (rahimahu-llah) said: and show it muqalqal if it is saakin and if it is in the position of stopping, it is clearer (from al-jazariyyah). This is it - only. The only thing that our scholars, and from the top of them is our Imaam, al-Jazariyy, said that the letter of qalqalah, if it comes in the middle of the word or in the middle of the speech it is muqalqal, but if we stop at it, the qalqalah is clearer, because when we stop at the letter it comes out with ease as there will be no letter after it. For example when I say "lam yalid wa lam yoolad", listen to the daal in yalid and yoolad... I didn't stop at "yalid" so I did qalqalah on it then directly put my mouth in the makhraj of the next letter, but if I had stopped at it..."lam yalide" the the daal will have nothing coming after it so the daal comes out comfortably. It is a very small difference between alqalqalah al-sughra (the smaller qalqalah) and al-qalqalah al-kubra (the greater qalqalah), and the only difference is in stopping. But as for the mushaddad letter and the one that is not mushaddad, then they are the same.
Some of our contemporary brothers who wrote books on tajweed differentiated between the mushaddad letter and the non-mushaddad letter, but this is only words from themselves which they don't have any evidence for, either logical or from the words of scholars. So I just wanted to point out this issue.
Watch